BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Vinay Joshi, J
The State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Ratansingh Parmar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details surrounding the initial bribe demand. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. discussion on invalid sanction and prosecutorial competence. (Para 8 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. examines evidence inconsistencies affecting guilt. (Para 9 , 11 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. overall assessment of trial court's reasonableness in acquittal. (Para 15) |
ORAL JUDGMENT:
. The challenge in this appeal is to the judgment and order dated 29th January, 2010 in ACB Special Case No. 50 / 2006 passed by the learned Special Judge, Greater Bombay, by which the Respondent (Orig. Accused) was acquitted for the ofence punishable under Sections 7 , 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption (for short “P.C.”) Act, 1988. The Court below acquitted the accused primarily on the ground of invalid sanction and improbability about the demand and acceptance of bribe amount.
2. The brief facts of the prosecution case can be stated as under: The Respondent (Orgi. Accused) was serving as an Assistant Police Inspector with MIDC Police Station, Mumbai. There was no dispute that the accused was a public servant within the meaning of Section 2(c) of the P.C. Act. On 16th February, 2005, the police have arrested a person namely Harjindersingh i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.