HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
JOHN D' SOUZA – Appellant
Versus
ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ANR – Respondent
WP 147/2007
1
1
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.147 OF 2007
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.147 OF 2007
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.147 OF 2007
John D’Souza,
Age -34 years, Occ: Service,
residing at 341, Room No.2728,
Motilal Nagar No.2, Bangur Nagar,
Goregaon (W),
Mumbai-400 090.
(At present detained in Central
Prison, Mumbai). .. Petitioner.
Petitioner.
Petitioner.
Vs
Vs
Vs
1. Assistant Commissioner of Police,
B-1/Special, DCB, CID, Mumbai.
2. Joint Commissioner of Police (Crime)
Crime Branch, CID, Mumbai.
3. Commissioner of Police,
Brihanmumbai.
4. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents
Respondents
Respondents
Mr M.S.Mohite, for the petitioner.
Mr S.R.Borulkar, Public Prosecutor for the respondents.
CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ.
CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ.
CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ.
DATED : 30th APRIL, 2007
DATED : 30th APRIL, 2007
DATED : 30th APRIL, 2007
ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per D.B.Bhosale, J.)
ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per D.B.Bhosale, J.)
ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per D.B.Bhosale, J.)
1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India read with section 482 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, "the Code")
raises the following questions:-
(i) Whether it is necessary that a separate
information under section 23(1)(a) of
Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999
("for short,"MCOCA"), should be recorded after
the approval is accorded under this section even
2
2
2
in cases where the crime had already been
registered after recording the FIR under section
154 of the Code for the offences under the
Indian Penal Code?
(ii) Whether a police officer, other than the
officer mentioned in section 23(1)(a) of MCOCA,
has power to club two or more similar offences
together, having been committed by the very same
organised crime syndicate before the sanction
under section 23(2) is accorded, without seeking
a fresh approval in respect thereof and the
police officer mentioned in sub-section 23(1)(b)
can proceed to investigate them as a single
offence?
(iii) Whether the sanction accorded under
section 23(2) of MCOCA would be rendered invalid
on the ground that the prior approval under
section 23(1)(a) was not obtained for recording
an information about an offence registered
earlier bearing DCB, CID No.87/2005, which is
clubbed wi