Back
APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
Mrs. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J
Anagha Hitesh Arya – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and context of the application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented concerning the prosecution's claims. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal standards and principles regarding abetment. (Para 6 , 8 , 10) |
| 4. assessment of evidence concerning the establishment of mens rea. (Para 15 , 20) |
| 5. outcome and judgment delivered. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT:
1. This Revision application is moved by the applicant/accused against the judgment and order dated 12.12.2017 below exhibit 4 in Sessions Case No.179 of 2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Thane rejecting the discharge application. The applicant/accused is the wife of the deceased/husband, who is facing prosecution u/s 306 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that the applicant/accused and her husband Hitesh got married in December, 2002. In 2005, the applicant/wife delivered a boy and they all were residing together at Thane. The deceased Hitesh was working in ICICI bank. The couple was not sailing smooth due to the disputes between them. Both of them were suspicious about each other. The deceased Hitesh used to inform about the torture and harassment at th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
