SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SANTOSH TUKARAM MAHADIK – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


(30)-IA-400-2022 IN CA-95-2022.doc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 400 OF 2022

IN

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 95 OF 2022

Santosh Tukaram Mahadik

..Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra

..Respondent

Ms. Tamanna I. Shaikh Advocate for the Applicant.

Ms. P.N. Dabholkar, APP for the Respondent-State.

CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

DATE : 23rd February, 2022.

P.C.

1.

The applicant has preferred this application for

suspension of sentence of imprisonment and grant of bail during the

pendency of Criminal Appeal No.95 of 2022.

2.

The applicant is convicted for the offence punishable

under Section 395 of Indian Penal Code (for short “IPC”) and

sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six years and to pay

fine of Rs.5,000/-.

Sunny Thote 1 of 5

SAJAKALI

LIYAKAT

JAMADAR

Digitally

signed by

SAJAKALI

LIYAKAT

JAMADAR

Date:

2022.03.25

17:58:14

+0530

(30)-IA-400-2022 IN CA-95-2022.doc.

3.

The case of the prosecution is that the complainant is in

business of purchase and sale of landed property. Accused No. 6 is

in similar business. Complainant had sold the land to his brother

through estate age

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top