SANTOSH TUKARAM MAHADIK – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
(30)-IA-400-2022 IN CA-95-2022.doc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 400 OF 2022
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 95 OF 2022
Santosh Tukaram Mahadik
..Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra
..Respondent
Ms. Tamanna I. Shaikh Advocate for the Applicant.
Ms. P.N. Dabholkar, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE : 23rd February, 2022.
P.C.
1.
The applicant has preferred this application for
suspension of sentence of imprisonment and grant of bail during the
pendency of Criminal Appeal No.95 of 2022.
2.
The applicant is convicted for the offence punishable
under Section 395 of Indian Penal Code (for short “IPC”) and
sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six years and to pay
fine of Rs.5,000/-.
Sunny Thote 1 of 5
SAJAKALI
LIYAKAT
JAMADAR
Digitally
signed by
SAJAKALI
LIYAKAT
JAMADAR
Date:
2022.03.25
17:58:14
+0530
(30)-IA-400-2022 IN CA-95-2022.doc.
3.
The case of the prosecution is that the complainant is in
business of purchase and sale of landed property. Accused No. 6 is
in similar business. Complainant had sold the land to his brother
through estate age
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.