SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VIJAY SAKHARAM KAMBLE – Appellant
Versus
VANITA VIJAY KAMBLE and ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPELATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPELATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO.1703 OF 2003

WRIT PETITION NO.1703 OF 2003

WRIT PETITION NO.1703 OF 2003

Vijay Sakharam Kamble. ...Petitioner.

V/s.

V/s.

V/s.

Vanita Vijay Kamble & Anr. ...Respondent.

Shris A.G.Toraskar, Advocate for Petitioner.

Ms.Madhavi M. Tavanandi,Advocate for Respondent No.1.

Shri B.H.Mehta, APP for Respondent No.2.

CORAM: A.S.AGUIAR,J

CORAM: A.S.AGUIAR,J

CORAM: A.S.AGUIAR,J

DATE : 27TH AUGUST,2004.

DATE : 27TH AUGUST,2004.

DATE : 27TH AUGUST,2004.

P.C. :-

P.C. :-

P.C. :-

1. Heard the learned Advocates. Rule returnable

forthwith by consent.

2. From the avernment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top