SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J
Hitesh Hemant Malhotra – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 352 OF 2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Suhas Oak, Mr. Vinod Utekar
For the Respondents: Ms. Prajakta P. Shinde

The weight of neutral substances should not be included in the determination of commercial quantity for narcotic drugs.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 2, 8(c), 20(b), 22(c), and 37 - Bail application - Applicant found with LSD and charas, quantities below commercial threshold - Court held Section 37 not applicable as substantial evidence showed the amount was less than prescribed limits. (Paras 3-10)

(B) Interpretation of commercial quantity - Court found that the determination of quantity must not include the weight of non-narcotic mediums like paper when assessing drug weight. (Paras 8-10)

Facts of the case:
Applicant arrested for possessing LSD and charas. Previous criminal record non-existent; bail sought based on insufficient drug weight.

Findings of Court:
Quantities were below commercial limits and bail conditions established.

Issues: Whether the quantity of drugs constituted commercial amounts affecting bail decision.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that only the pure drug content must be considered, excluding carrier weights.

Result: Application for bail granted with specific conditions.

Table of Content
1. details on the applicant's arrest and drug recovery. (Para 1)
2. determining drug quantity requires excluding weight of paper in certain cases. (Para 2 , 3 , 6 , 10)
3. legal interpretation of commercial quantity and its implications for bail. (Para 4 , 9)
4. bail was granted based on absence of criminal history and compliance with conditions. (Para 7 , 8 , 11)

2. On 8.6.2019 on personal search of the applicant, 10 square pieces of papers containing LSD drops of LSD solutions were found and recovered. Subsequently, on the same day, in house search, 13 pieces of brown colour papers each admeasuring 1/1 cm in size containing LSD drops of LSD solution were recovered. Additionally, 970 gms (570+400 gms) of charas, kept in the cupboard was recovered. Applicant was apprehended on 8.6.2019 for the offences punishable under Sections 8 (c), 20(b), 22(c) and 29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances “ ”

Act (NDPS Act for short) in connection with Crime No.153/2019 is registered with Vartak Nagar Police Station, Thane.

3. Applicant is seeking bail on the ground that quantity of contraband i.e. LSD and charas allegedly found and recovered from the person of applicant and his house was less than the, commercial quantity, and therefore rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, are not applicable to the facts of this case. Besides, it is contended that, applicant has no criminal antecedents. Also submitted that, the investigation is over and applicants presence for the trial can be secured by imposing appropriate conditions.

4. Before appreciating the submissions advanced by the Counsel for the applicant, it may be stated that;

. LSD is sold on the street in small tablets (micro dots), capsules or gelatin squares. In its pure state, LSD is white, odourless substance. However, LSD is so potent that an effective small dose of pure drug, is virtually invisible. As a result, it is usually diluted in other materials.

. In this case, drug was found in the form of drops, dried onto 23 pieces of papers. 5. It may be stated that, at serial no.133 of Table appended to the Act, small quantity in relation to LSD is 0.002, whereas, commercial quantity is 0.1 gms and sofar as charas is concerned, commercial quantity is 1 kg.

6. Learned Counsel for the applicant would submit that, total weight of 10 pieces of paper containing LSD drops, found on the person of the applicant was 140 milligrams. However, 13 pieces of papers containing drops of LSD solution allegedly found and ’ ’

recovered, from applicants house, its weight has not been stated either in panchanama, nor it could be found in the chargesheet. Relying on the CA report, it is contended that, net weight of the drops of LSD solution on the 23 papers (Exhibit ½ No.1/1, , 1/3 and Exhibit No.(2)), as found was 0.4128 milligram which is less than commercial quantity i.e. 0.1 gm. Counsel would therefore argue that, weight of LSD ’ ‘ ’

drops and charas (970 gram), allegedly recovered was less than commercial quantity and therefore there is no impediment in releasing the applicant on bail, in as much as, rigors of Section 37 are not applicable to the facts of this case.

7. On the other hand, learned APP has supported the order passed by the learned Sessions Court and also relied on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Hira Singh & Anr. V/s. Union of India (Criminal Appeal No. 722/2017).

8. I have perused the First Information Report, Recovery Panchanamas and Chemical Analysers report. At the outset, it may be stated that the most common form of LSD is drop of LSD solution dried onto piece of paper or gelatin sheet, pieces of blotting papers which releases the drop when swalloed/consumed. In this case, drug was found in the form of drops dried onto 23 pieces of papers. Thus, process of drying LSD solution on a piece of paper, merely facilitates consumption of drug. This process neither changes the substance of the drug or its chemical composition. It is argued by the State, that sin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top