SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SHIVAJI ANGAD PHAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


1/3 39 BA368.22.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

BAIL APPLICATION NO.368 OF 2022

Shivaji Angad Phad

..

Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

..

Respondent

Mr. Imtiyaz Patel a/w Suraj Gaikwad & Mr. Sanket Gaikwad for

the Applicant.

Mrs. Anamika Malhotra, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.

CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATED : 19th AUGUST, 2022

P.C:-

1.

The applicant is charged under section 376, 376 (2)n and

417 of IPC, pursuant to a complaint filed by the prosecutrix on

2/10/2021. He came to be arrested on 3/10/2021 and is

incarcerated since then.

On perusal of the material compiled in the charge-sheet, it

is the case of the prosecution that the prosecutrix was a married

women who had two children from said wedlock. However, in

the year 2020, she had obtained divorce from her husband and

started residing in her parental house.

She was acquainted to the applicant, who was working in

the same company, where she was working and they exchanged

their telephone numbers and started chatting with each other. A

Ashis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top