SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

VIJAY ANANDRAO PATIL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA and ORS – Respondent


1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE

AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1819 OF 2003

Vijay Anandrao Patil

...Petitioner

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...Respondents

None for the Petitioner

Mr. P.S. Hingorani, A. P. P for Respondents 1 to 9

CORAM: SHRI R.M.S . KHANDEPARKAR &

SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ.

DATED: 27TH JULY, 2007

P.C.

1. None present for the Petitioner. Mr. Hingorani, A. P. P

present for Respondents 1 to 9.

2. Heard the learned A. P. P. Perused the Petition and

annexures thereto.

3. In the present Petition the Petitioner is seeking relief in

the nature of compensation to the tune of Rs.50 Crores or

any other appropriate amount for the alleged custodial

torture of the Petitioner and alleged false implication of the

Petitioner in the criminal cases by the Respondents.

2

4. The grievance of the Petitioner is that on 28 th January,

1990 Petitioner's brother by name Balasaheb was murdered

by Babasaheb Bhimsen Patil, Mansingh Bhimsen Patil,

Sanjay Bhimsen Patil, Jagannath Tanaji Shinde, Gaja

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top