HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
MAHYA LAKHIYA RADIYA AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
APPLN 489/2007
[1]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.489 OF 2007
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.489 OF 2007
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.489 OF 2007
1. Mahya Lakhiya Radiya
2. Prakash Laxman Gurjar
3. Bhavarsinh Bharatsingh
4. Ramanbhai Chhaganbhai Patil
5. Gopal Kishan Halpati
6. Vijaysinh Parsuram Rama
7 Badhya Mahya Radiya ..Applicants
V/s
1. State of Maharashtra
2. Union Territory of Dadra
and Nagar Haveli ..Respondents.
Mr. S.V.Marwadi, Advocate for the applicant.
Mrs. M.H. Mhatre for the State.
Mr. D.A. Nalavade, APP for respondent No.2.
CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J.
CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J.
CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J.
DATE : 21ST FEBRUARY, 2007.
DATE : 21ST FEBRUARY, 2007.
DATE : 21ST FEBRUARY, 2007.
P.C.
. Leave to add respondent No.2. Amendment be
carried out immediately.
2. Heard Mr. Marwadi, learned Counsel for the
applicant and Mr. Nalawade, learned APP for the Union
Territory. The applicants, who are arrested in Crime
No.30/2007 registered at Silvassa Police Station
Silvassa on 2nd February, 2007 seek to be released on
[2]
bail.
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that one
Rajendra Singh Dodi was carrying on the business of
quarrying in agricultural lands without any licence from
the competent authority under Explosive Act, 1884. It
came to the notice of Revenue Authorities and therefore,
they raided the spot. The present applicants, who were
working there, were arrested. Main accused, Rajendra
Singh is absconding. The offence is registered under
Section 4, 5, and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act 1908
on the ground that the present applicants were found in
possession of explosive substances and were using the
same for effecting explosion for the purposes of
quarrying in the said field. The application for bail
filed by the present applicants came to be rejected by
the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Silvassa, as well
as by the learned Sessions Judge, mainly on the ground
that the offences under section 4, 5 and 6 of the
Explosive Substances Act 1908 are serious and are
punishable with imprisonment for life. It was also
noted that the main accused Rajendra Singh is yet to be
arrested and two of the accused persons are not resident
of Union Territory.
[3]
4. Perused the record. The learned Counsel for the
applicants contended that the case falls under
Explosives Act 1884 and not under the Explosive
Substances Act 1908 while learned public prosecutor
contended that the case falls under Explosive Substances
Act . On careful perusal of the provisions of these two
Acts it appears it appears that prima facie case falls
under section 9-B of the Explosive Act, 1884
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.