SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KALLAPPA IRAPPA BIRADAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


1/7 25 BA 590-21.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.590 of 2021

Kallappa Irappa Biradar

.. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

.. Respondent

Mr. Umesh Mankapure for the applicant.

Mr.A.K. Kapadnis, APP for the State.

CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATED : 20th AUGUST, 2021

P.C:-

1

The applicant is charge-sheeted in C.R.No. 69 of

2020 for the offence punishable under Section 20(b), 22 and 8(c)

of NDPS Act, and being arrested on 6th October 2020, he seek

his release on bail.

2

The foremost ground on which the bail is sought is,

the ganja seized and sent for panchnama is not the flowering or

fruiting but the entire plant has been seized and this do not fall

within the purview of ganja as defined in Section 2(ii)(b) of the

NDPS Act.

3

With the assistance of learned counsel for the

applicant and the learned APP, I have perused the entire charge-

Tilak

2/7 25 BA 590-21.doc

sheet which include the panchnama. On i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top