SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SHRI JACKIE @ SULTANA ASHOK DARYANI and ANR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates:
['SHRI A R SHAIKH', '', 'SHARMILA KAUSHIK', 'SHARMILA KAUSHIK', 'FOR APPELLANT NO V P FILED', 'P P', '', 'P P']

: 1 :

IN

IN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL

CRIMINAL

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL

CRIMINAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.695 OF 1999

APPEAL NO.695 OF 1999

APPEAL NO.695 OF 1999

1. Jackie @ Sultana Ashok Daryani

R/o.S.T. Stand Zopadpatti, Manmad,

at present in Jail

2. Suman Arun Mahale,

S.T. Stand Zopadpatti, Manmad

...Appellants

V/s.

State of Maharashtra,

thru’ P.I. of Manmad Police Station

...Respondent

Mrs.Sharmila Kaushik, Advocate, for the Appellants.

Mrs.M.M. Deshmukh, APP, for the Respondent.

CORAM

CORAM

CORAM : J.N. PATEL &

: J.N. PATEL &

: J.N. PATEL &

A.A.

A.A.

A.A. SAYED, JJ.

SAYED, JJ.

SAYED, JJ.

DATE

DATE

DATE : 12TH APRIL, 2007.

: 12TH APRIL, 2007.

: 12TH APRIL, 2007.

ORAL

ORAL

ORAL JUDGMENT : [ Per A.A. Sayed, J. ]

JUDGMENT : [ Per A.A. Sayed, J. ]

JUDGMENT : [ Per A.A. Sayed, J. ]

1.

The above Appeal is preferred against a

judgment and order dated 17.11.1999 of conviction,

passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon in

Sessions Case No.1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top