SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
PRALHAD TUKARAM KHARATKAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates:
['M S MOHITE', '', 'SAROJINI UPADHYAY', 'APPOINTED FROM LEGAL AID']

PNP

1/13

Apeal166-21.8

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.166 OF 2009

Pralhad Tukaram Kharatkar

Age 36 years, Occu : Driver,

R/o. Pavnegaon, Navi Mumbai,

Dist – Thane,

(At present detained at

Thane Central Prison)

..Appellant.

versus

The State of Maharashtra

..Respondent.

.....

Ms. Sarojini Upadhyay, advocate appointed for the Appellant.

Mrs. A.S. Pai, Addl.P.P. for the Respondent – State.

.....

CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &

A.S. GADKARI, JJ.

21st August, 2015.

JUDGMENT (PER A.S. GADKARI, J.) :

The Appellant has challenged the judgment and order dated 2nd

January, 2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane in

Sessions Case No.303/2006 thereby convicting the Appellant for an

offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and

sentencing him to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine of

Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple

imprisonment for six months.

2.

The facts which are necessary to decide the present Appeal can

briefly be stated as under :

The Appellant is the husband of the complainant (P.W.1) Rekha

PNP

2/13

Apeal166-21

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top