SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NIKITA JACOB – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS – Respondent


1 of 14 56.ABA.441.2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.441 OF 2021

Nikita Jacob

Applicant

versus

The State of Maharashtra

Respondent

Mr.Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Manoj Mohite, Senior

Advocate, with Mr.Girish Godbole i/by Mr.Abhishek Yende, Sanjokta

Dey and Varun Thokal for applicant.

Mr.H.S.Venegavkar, Special Public Prosecutor, for respondent no.2.

Mr.Swapnil S. Pednekar, APP, for State.

CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

DATE : 17th February 2021

PC :

1.

This is an application under Section 438 of Code of Criminal

Procedure seeking transit anticipatory bail for a period of four weeks

to enable the applicant to approach appropriate Court for reliefs. The

applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with CR No.49 of

2021 registered at Special Cell, New Delhi for offences under

Sections 124A, 153, 153A, and 120B of Indian Penal Code.

2.

The contention of the applicant is that she is a practicing

lawyer at Bombay High Court since 2014. She has volunteered in

environmental movement which helps to create awar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top