HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
MRS. PUJA DILIPRAO KHEDKAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS – Respondent
WP 3118/2022
13-wp.3118.2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3118 OF 2022
Puja Diliprao Khedkar
...Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. Abhay Anil Anturkar, a/w Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Mr. Harshvardhan
Suryavanshi, Bhavya Pande and Mr. Dhruv Tonk, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Rui Rodrigues a/w Mr. R. R. Shetty and Mr. A. A. Garge, for the
Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Mr. Vinod Joshi, for the Respondent No.4.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ.
DATE : 18th APRIL 2022
P.C. :
1.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2.
By this petition, the petitioner has sought the following
substantive reliefs:-
“6.
….. …..
(A)
That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ mandamus,
or a writ in the nature of mandamus, or any other appropriate
writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of
N. S. Chitnis
1/8
NISHA
SANDEEP
CHITNIS
Digitally signed by
NISHA SANDEEP
CHITNIS
Date: 2022.04.22
12:21:31 +0530
13-wp.3118.2022.doc
India quashing and setting aside the Letter No. 13018/7/2020-
ASI-I dated 03.03.2021 issued by the Government of India,
Ministry of Personnel and Training, to the Secretary, Union
Public Service Commission forwarding the consolidated
tentative vacancy position of Cadre Controlling Authority
(CCAs) to the extent that it provides for no vacancies for
persons with benchmark disabilities in category (d) of Section
34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, as
being ultra vires the said Act as well as Articles 14 and 21 of
the Constitution of India;
(B)
That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ mandamus,
or a writ in the nature of mandamus, or any other appropriate
writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India directing the Respondents herein to make the sufficient
reservations for persons suffering from benchmark disability
provided for in category (d) in terms of the Rights of Persons
with Disabilities Act, 2016, and suitably amend the paragraph
from Notification dated 04.04.2021 issued by the Union Public
Service Commission;
(C)
That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ mandamus,
or a writ in the nature of mandamus, or any other appropriate
writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India directing the Respondents to include persons belonging
to category (d) in addition to those belonging to categories (a),
(b) and (c), to get the benefit of the reservations made for
persons suffering from multiple disabilities under category (e);
(D)
That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ mandamus,
or a writ in the nature of mandamus, or any other appropriate
writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India directing the Respondents to extend the facility of
unlimited attempts to persons with benchmark disabilities;
(E)
That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ mandamus,
or a writ in the nature of mandamus, or any other appropriate
writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of
N. S. Chitnis
2/8
13-wp.3118.2022.doc
India directing the Respondents to carry forward all the
backlog of unfilled vacancies since the passing of the Act
pertaining to the category of the Petitioner;
(F)
That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ mandamus,
or a writ in the nature of mandamus, or any other appropriate
writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India directing the Respondents to reserve 4% of 712
vacancies for persons with benchmark disabilities in terms of
Section 34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act,
2016;
(G)
That alternatively, this Hon’ble Court may direct the
Respondents to consider the Petitioner’s disability under
category (d) and thereafter consider her candidature under
category (e) as she suffers from multiple disabilit