HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
M.B. RAWATE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR – Respondent
WP 678/2005
[-1-]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.678 OF 2005
IN
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 1562/S/2002
IN
CRIMINAL CASE MISC. /270/2000
Dr.M.B.Rawate ..Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
and Ors. ..Respondents
...
Petitioner in person present
Mrs.A.S.Pai A.P.P. for the State
Respondent no.2-Shri.Shankar Rao Yesare
in person
...
CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.
CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.
CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.
DATE : DECEMBER 5, 2007
DATE : DECEMBER 5, 2007
DATE : DECEMBER 5, 2007
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the petitioner in person, the learned
A.P.P. for the State and the Respondent no.2 who
is present in person.
2. The petitioner-original complainant had filed
complaint against Respondent No.2 being Criminal
Misc. Case No. 270 of 2000. The said complaint
is under Sections 213, 217, 218, 219, 120-B r.w.
[-2-]
109 and 34 r.w. 114 of the IPC. In the said case,
the process came to be issued by the learned
Magistrate under Sections 213, 217 and 218 of IPC.
Thereafter, respondent no.2 preferred application
before the learned Magistrate for recall of
process. By order dated 5.4.2004 the learned
Magistrate recalled the process. Being aggrieved
by this order, the present petition has been
preferred.
3. The petitioner has submitted that in view of
the decision of the Supreme Court by a Bench of
three Judges in the case of Adalat Prasad V.
Adalat Prasad V.
Adalat Prasad V.
Rooplal Jindal, 2004(2) Bom.C.R. (Cri.) (S.C.)
Rooplal Jindal, 2004(2) Bom.C.R. (Cri.) (S.C.)
Rooplal Jindal, 2004(2) Bom.C.R. (Cri.) (S.C.)
857: 2004(4) Mh.L.J. 274
857: 2004(4) Mh.L.J. 274
857: 2004(4) Mh.L.J. 274, the Magistrate has no
power to recall the process. He further submitted
that in view of the said decision, the Magistrate
has no powers to review his orders and in such
case, the process issued by the Magistrate, could
not have been recalled by the learned Magistrate
and the remedy open to the accused was that he
should have approached the higher forum.
4. No doubt, in the case of Adalat Prasad (supra)
Adalat Prasad (supra)
Adalat Prasad (supra),
it has been held by the Supreme Court that
[-3-]
Magistrate cannot review his order and thus cannot
recall the process issued by him. However, it is
seen that decision in the case of Adalat Prasad
Adalat Prasad
Adalat Prasad is
dated 25th August, 2004 whereas, in the present
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.