SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
KEVAL FULCHAND SHAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA and ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['SHRI RAMESH A KARALE', 'GOVT PLEADER', '', 'SHRI K B ADYANTHAYA']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

SECOND APPEAL NO. 581 OF 2004

Keval Fulchand Shah.

... Appellant.

Versus.

The State of Maharashtra & ors.

... Respondents.

Shri Ramesh A.Karale for the Appellant.

Shri K.K.Tated, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1-State.

Shri K.B.Adyanthaya for the Respondents Nos.2 & 3.

CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J.

DATED : 23nd February, 2005.

P.C.:

1. Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the

parties.

2.

The

Appeal

is

filed

by

the

original

Plaintiff.

The

Plaintiff

claims

to

be

the

owner

of

a

residential

flat.

On

the

basis

of

the

Award

passed

by

the

Cooperative

Court,

the

suit

flat

has

been

attached

by

the

Special

Recovery

Officer.

In

the

suit

filed

by

the

Appellant/Plaintiff in substance the challenge is to the

order of attachment.

3.

The

trial

Court

held

that

the

suit

was

not

maintainable

as

remedy

was

available

to

the

Appellant

to

prefer

a

claim

under

sub-rule

19(a)

of

Rule

107

of

the

Maharashtra

Cooperative

Societies

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top