BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
DILIP PANDRANG KAMATH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR – Respondent
WP 758/2006
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.758 OF 2006
Dilip Pandurang Kamath, )
Age 45 years, Residing at )
R.N.A.Park, No.A-1/302, )
Vashi Naka, Mumbai - 400 074. ).. Petitioner
(Org.Accused No.7)
Vs.
1. The State of Maharashtra, )
Represented by its Secretary)
Home Department, )
Mantralaya, Mumbai. )
2. Central Bureau of )
Investigation, having its )
Regional Office at Colaba, )
Mumbai. ).. Respondents
--
Shri Samir A. Vaidya, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Shri V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent No.1.
Shri P.D.Gharat, Special Public Prosecutor, for the
Respondent No.2.
--
CORAM : SRI R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR &
SRI A.A.SAYED, JJ
DATED : 13TH FEBRUARY, 2008
ORAL JUDGMENT : ( PER R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J )
ORAL JUDGMENT : ( PER R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J )
ORAL JUDGMENT : ( PER R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J )
1. Heard. A short point for consideration in
this matter is whether the detention of the petitioner
from 10th March, 2006 onwards is illegal and unlawful
for the want of warrant of remand in accordance with
- 2 -
the provisions of Section 309(2) of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973. It is the case of the
petitioner that the petitioner was arrested in July,
2004 in relation to the C.C.No.91/PW/2004 arising out
of C.R.No.78 of 1998. It is his further case that he
has been in the judicial custody and is lodged in
Yerawada Central Prison, Pune, since his arrest.
Further, it is the case of the petitioner that the
judicial custody was extended from time to time.
However, since 10th March, 2006, the petitioner is
illegally detained without any such warrant of remand
having been issued by the Magistrate under Section
309(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and thereby a
personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the
Constitution is denied to him.
2. Placing reliance in the decisions in the
matters of Manohari v. State of Rajasthan,
Manohari v. State of Rajasthan,
Manohari v. State of Rajasthan, reported
in 1983 Cri.L.J. 1231, Urooj Abbas v. State of Uttar
Urooj Abbas v. State of Uttar
Urooj Abbas v. State of Uttar
Pradesh,
Pradesh,
Pradesh, reported in 1973 Cri.L.J. 1458 (F.B.),
Raghavendra Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.,
Raghavendra Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.,
Raghavendra Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.,
reported in 1976 Cr.L.J. 1782, Surendra Tiwari v.
Surendra Tiwari v.
Surendra Tiwari v.
State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.,
State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.,
State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors., reported in 1994
Cri.L.J. 805 and Ram Narayan Singh v. The State of
Ram Narayan Singh v. The State of
Ram Narayan Singh v. The State of
Delhi & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.