GULAB SHRIPATI SALVE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
ABA 739/2021
10-ABA-739-2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 739 OF 2021
Gulab Shripati Salve
… Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
… Respondent
…..
Mr. Ravindra Sawant i/b. Dhiraj Legal Associates, Advocate for the
Applicant.
Mr. Y. M. Nakhwa, APP for the Respondent – State.
Mr. Ashfaque Shaikh, (A.P.I.) Vanrai Police Station, Present.
..…
CORAM
:
PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE
:
26th APRIL, 2021
PER COURT
:
1.
This is an application for anticipatory bail in C.R. No.
1001 of 2020 registered with Vanrai Police Station, Mumbai for
offences under Sections 307, 504, 143, 147, 148, 149, 506 of Indian
Penal Code (for short “IPC”). The First Information Report (for short
‘FIR’) was registered on 26th December, 2020.
2.
The complainant Arjun Sahejrao has alleged that, there
was quarrel on 25th December, 2020. On 26th December, 2020,
applicant, co-accused Vishal Salve, Vicky Salve, Vinod More and
Tushar Sawant assaulted the complainant. Thereafter, Vishal Salve
gave blow by weapon on the chest of the complainant. Vicky Salve
also assaulted on the right shoulder and the applicant assaulted by
sharp weapon on the face of the complainant. The other accused
Sajakali Jamadar
1 of 2
10-ABA-739-2021.doc
assaulted him by fist and kick blows. The applicant has also
instigated others to assault the complainant.
3.
Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that there
is discrepancy in the time of the incident as reflected in the FIR and
C.C.T.V. footage. The co-accused were arrested and granted bail.
Offence under Section 307 is not made out. The applicant has been
falsely implicated in this case. Charge-sheet is filed against arrested
accused.
4.
Learned APP submitted that the specific role has been
attributed to the applicant. He was armed with weapon. He assaulted
the injured. The injury certificate of the injured mention that he had
suffered three grievous and one simple injury.
5.
On perusal of the FIR and other documents it is
apparent that, overt act of assault has been attributed to the
applicant. He was allegedly armed with weapon. The injured had
sustained four injuries. Considering the material on record, no case
for grant of anticipatory bail is made out.
ORDER
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 739 of 2021 is rejected
and stands disposed of accordingly.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
Sajakali Jamadar
2 of 2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.