SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Appellant
Versus
BALASAHEB BABASAHEB PATIL AND ORS – Respondent


1/8

6.APEAL-309-2009.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.309 OF 2009

The State of Maharashtra

….Appellant/Complainant

V/s.

1. Balasaheb Babasaheb Patil

Age : 29 years, R/o. Village – Halondi,

Taluka – Hatkanangale, District –

Kolhapur

2. Tatyasaheb Babasaheb Patil

Age : 26 years, R/o. Village – Halondi,

Taluka – Hatkanangale, District –

Kolhapur

3. Babasaheb Payagonda Patil

Age : 56 years, R/o. Village – Halondi,

Taluka – Hatkanangale, District –

Kolhapur

4. Pradeep Bhimgonda Patil

Age : 26 years, R/o. Village – Halondi,

Taluka – Hatkanangale, District –

Kolhapur

.….Respondents/accused

----

Mrs. Anamika Malhotra, APP for State – Appellant.

None for respondents.

----

CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATE : 22nd JANUARY 2021

ORAL JUDGMENT :

1

This is an appeal impugning an order and judgment dated

9th May 2008 passed by the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Ichalkaranji,

acquitting respondents (accused) of offences punishable under Sections

324 (Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means),

323 (Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (Intentional insult with

intent to provoke breach of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top