SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
SHRADDHA SURESH BANE AND ANR – Respondent


6-apeal.289.2021...doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.289 OF 2021

Prakash Shrivastava

...Appellant

Versus

Shraddha Suresh Bane

Through her Constituted Attorney -

Suresh Ganpatrao Bane and Anr.

...Respondents

Mr. Vikram Sutaria a/w Mr. Mithilesh Mishra, for the Appellant.

Mr. Tanmay T. Jadhav a/w Mr. Mohan Talati, for the Respondent

No.1.

Mr. V. B. Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P for the Respondent No.2 – State.

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &

V. G. BISHT, JJ.

DATE : 14th JUNE 2022

P.C. :

1.

At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave

to amend the prayer clause. Leave granted. Amendment to be carried

out forthwith.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

N. S. Chitnis

1/8

NISHA

SANDEEP

CHITNIS

Digitally signed by

NISHA SANDEEP

CHITNIS

Date: 2022.06.17

14:29:24 +0530

6-apeal.289.2021...doc

3.

By this appeal, the appellant has sought the following

substantive relief:-

“c.

This Hon'ble Court be pleased to quash and set

aside the orders dated 5/02/2021 and 26/02/2020

passed by the Ld. Trial Court in Special Case MPID

No. 11/2016, to the extent that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top