SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SANDEEP RAMMILAN SHUKLA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS – Respondent


1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.271 OF 2007

IN

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.982 OF 2007

Sandeep Rammilan Shukla

.. Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

.. Respondents

Mr.S.M.Kazi, Senior Advocate with B.P.Pandey for petitioner

Mrs.A.S.Pai, A.P.P. For State.

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO.2031 OF 2007

Vimal Appaso Lohar

.. Petitioner

Versus

The Chief Secretary & Ors.

.. Respondents

WITH

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.219 OF 2007

IN

WRIT PETITION NO.982 OF 2007

Chandresh C. Shah

.. Petitioner

Versus

Sandeep R. Shukla & Ors.

.. Respondents

2

CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J &

S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.

Reserved on

: 7th July 2009

Pronounced on

: 13th August 2009.

ORAL JUDGEMENT (PER DHARMADHIKARI, J)

A]

Rule. Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 waive service. By consent Rule made

returnable forthwith.

1]

By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the

petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-

“(A) That the two investigations being done vide

Cr.No.144 of 2007 of Nagpada Police Station, Mumbai ( i.e.

C.R.No.27 of 2007 of the Anti Extortion Cell of the Crime

Branch, Mumbai Polic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top