SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PANDIT MUKUND PATIL AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR – Respondent


17-apeal.405.2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.405 OF 2022

1. Pandit Mukund Patil

2. Shobha @Pratibha Pandit Patil

3. Ramesh Kishor Jadhav

...Appellants

(Org. Accused No.2,3,4)

Versus

The State of Maharastra and Anr.

...Respondents

Ms. Pravada Raut a/w Mr. Yogesh Rawool i/b Mr. Shailesh S. Redekar,

for the Appellants.

Ms. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent No.1 – State.

Ms. Ameeta Kuttikrishnan, Appointed Advocate for the Respondent

No.2.

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &

V. G. BISHT, JJ.

DATE : 4th JULY 2022

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

By this appeal, the appellants seek pre-arrest bail in

connection with C.R. No.102 of 2022, registered with the Arnala

N. S. Chitnis

1/5

NISHA

SANDEEP

CHITNIS

Digitally signed by

NISHA SANDEEP

CHITNIS

Date: 2022.07.05

16:00:19 +0530

17-apeal.405.2022.doc

Police Station, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 376,

376 (2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3(1)(w)(i) of

the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)

Act (for short 'SCST Act').

3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top