SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M/S. AESTHETIC LAND SCAPING THR. RAHUL TIRTHRAJ YADAV – Appellant
Versus
THE NAVI MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR – Respondent


12-wp 1180-21(J)

1/5

Prajakta Vartak

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO.1180 OF 2021

M/s.Aesthetic Land Scaping through

Mr.Rahul Tirthraj Yadav

...Petitioner

vs.

The Navi Mumbai Municipal

Corporation & Anr.

...Respondents

WITH

WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO.9548 OF 2021

M/s.D.B. Infratech

...Petitioner

vs.

The Navi Mumbai Municipal

Corporation & Anr.

...Respondents

…..

Mr.Chirag Kamdar i/b. Mr.Bipin Joshi for Petitioner.

Mr.Sandeep Marne for Respondents.

…..

CORAM :- DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ &

G. S. KULKARNI, J.

DATE :-

APRIL 27, 2021.

ORAL JUDGMENT :

1.

Questions of fact and law raised in these two writ petitions

are common; hence, we propose to dispose of the same by this

common Judgment.

2.

The case run by the petitioner in Writ Petition No.1180 of

2021 is that its bid pursuant to a tender has been considered

12-wp 1180-21(J)

2/5

non-responsive by the Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation on

the ground that it did not submit an undertaking on a stamp

paper of Rs.500/- denomination.

3.

It is averred

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top