HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
NARIMAN HORMUSJI – Appellant
Versus
BEHRAM GORE POCHKHANWALA – Respondent
WP 222/1993
IN
IN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL
CIVIL
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT
WRIT
WRIT PETITION NO. 222 OF 1993.
PETITION NO. 222 OF 1993.
PETITION NO. 222 OF 1993.
Shri Nariman Hormusji,
]
since deceased through his legal
]
heirs and representatives;
]
1A. Smt. Mani Nariman Hormusji,
]
aged 84 years, occ. Housewife,.
]
residing at: Bhiwandi House,
]
92, August Kranti Marg,
]
Mumbai - 400 036.
]
1B. Smt. Zarine Rohington Ganjia,
]
age 45 years, Occ. Housewife,
]
r/at Flat No.402, 4th floor,
] .. Petitioners
Vatcha Gandhi Building, Vatcha
] Legal heirs of
Gandhi Road, Mumbai - 400 007. ] deceased Petnr.
Versus
Behram-Gore Pochkhanwala, only legal ]
heir and representative of deceased
]
Mrs. Khorshed Peshtom Pochkhanawala, ]
residing at Bhiwandi House, 92,
] .. Respondent
August Kranti Marg, Bombay - 400 036. ] (Org. Defdt.)
Mr. P.K. Dhakephalkar for the petitioners.
Mr. Milind Jamdar for the respondent No.1.
ALONGWITH
ALONGWITH
ALONGWITH
WRIT
WRIT
WRIT PETITION NO. 3195 OF 1993
PETITION NO. 3195 OF 1993
PETITION NO. 3195 OF 1993
Shri Nariman Hormusji,
]
since deceased through his legal
]
heirs and representatives;
]
1A. Smt. Mani Nariman Hormusji,
]
aged 84 years, occ. Housewife,.
]
residing at: Bhiwandi House,
]
92, August Kranti Marg,
]
Mumbai - 400 036.
]
1B. Smt. Zarine Rohington Ganjia,
]
age 45 years, Occ. Housewife,
]
r/at Flat No.402, 4th floor,
] .. Petitioners
: 2 :
Vatcha Gandhi Building, Vatcha
] Legal heirs of
Gandhi Road, Mumbai - 400 007. ] deceased Petnr.
Versus
Behram-Gore Pochkhanwala, only legal ]
heir and representative of deceased
]
Mrs. Khorshed Peshtom Pochkhanawala, ]
residing at Bhiwandi House, 92,
] .. Respondent
August Kranti Marg, Bombay - 400 036. ] (Org. Defdt.)
Mr. P.K. Dhakephalkar for the petitioner.
Mr. M. Jamdar for the respondent No.1.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATED: 11TH AUGUST, 2005
ORAL JUDGMENT. :
1.
Both these Writ Petitions are arising out of a
common judgment and order passed by the Additional Chief
Judge of Small Causes Court (for short "Appellate
Court") at Bombay dated 28th September, 1993, whereby,
both the Appeals filed by the common petitioners/heirs
of the original petitioner - paying guest - in both
these Writ Petitions have been dismissed and confirmed
the common judgment and order passed by the Small Causes
Court (for short "Trial Court") and resultantly
dismissed the Declaratory Suit No. 1590/5450 of 1974
filed by the petitioners and confirmed the suit for
: 3 :
possession filed by the respondent-owner (now deceased)
[for short "the respondent-owner"]. Therefore, these
two separate Writ Petitions by the common petitioners
(heirs) against common respondents (heirs).
2.
The premises is a flat on the second floor of
Bhiwandi House standing at 92, August Kranti Marg,
Bombay - 400 026, which consists of a hall and three bed
rooms, a kitchen, bathrooms and WCs. The original
petitioner (deceased petitioner) expired on 1/12/2002
The paying guest (petitioners heirs referred as "paying
guest"), when he was a bachelor in the year 1958 used to
reside with his mother in the suit premises i.e. one
big room facing to the road, separate bathroom and
lavatory with a common passage and kitchen in the said
flat. After marriage, the deceased petitioner has been
living with his wife, mother and daughter. There was no
written agreement of any kind with the deceased
respondent. Mrs. Khorshed Peshtom Pockhanawala. The
additional amenities have been provided to use gas for
cooking and electricity. The decea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.