HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
ANJUM ABDUL RAHEEM MERCHANT AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
ABA 845/2021
11 ABA-845-21.doc
BDP-SPS-TAC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.845 OF 2021
1] Anjum Abdul Raheem Merchant
2] Mr. Fayyaz Abdul Raheem Merchant
…. Applicants.
V/s
The State of Maharashtra
….. Respondent.
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 172 OF 2021
IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.845 OF 2021
Juma Masjid Trust
Intervener
In the matter between
1] Anjum Abdul Raheem Merchant
2] Mr. Fayyaz Abdul Raheem Merchant
…. Applicants.
V/s
The State of Maharashtra
….. Respondent.
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 20 OF 2021
IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.845 OF 2021
Mohd. Abdul Rauf Memon
Intervener
In the matter between
1] Anjum Abdul Raheem Merchant
2] Mr. Fayyaz Abdul Raheem Merchant
…. Applicants.
V/s
The State of Maharashtra
….. Respondent.
1/7
BHARAT
DASHARATH
PANDIT
Digitally signed
by BHARAT
DASHARATH
PANDIT
Date: 2021.11.08
14:33:32 +0530
11 ABA-845-21.doc
WITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION (ST) NO.3289 OF 2020
Jazil Nawarange
…. Applicant.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
….. Respondent.
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 19 OF 2021
IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3289 OF 2020
Juma Masjid Trust
…. Intervener
In the matter between
Jazil Nawarange
…. Applicant.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
….. Respondent.
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17 OF 2021
IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3289 OF 2020
Mohd. Abdul Rauf Memon
…. Intervener
In the matter between
Jazil Nawarange
…. Applicant.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
….. Respondent.
-----
Mr. Saurabh Mehta a/w Uzair Kazi i/b YMK Legal for the Applicants in
ABA/845/2021.
Mr. Smit Kirti Nagda a/w Mr. Atul Pathak for the Applicant in ABA
(St) No.3289 of 2020.
Ms. Shagufta Ansari for the Intervener in IA/20/2021 in
ABA/845/2021 and in IA/17/2021 in ABA(St) No.3289/2020.
2/7
11 ABA-845-21.doc
Ms. Vidhya N. Shet i/b Vaid Associates for the Intervener in
IA/172/2021 in ABA/845/2021 and in IA/19/2021 in ABA(St)
No.3289/2020.
Ms. A.A. Takalkar, APP for the Respondent/State.
PSI Pallavi Jadhav, L.T. Marg Police Station, present.
-----
CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE: OCTOBER 08, 2021
P.C.:-
1]
Applicants in both the above Applications are seeking pre-
arrest bail in C.R. No. 196 of 2020 registered with L. T. Marg Police
Station, for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468,
471, 380 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2]
Prosecution case against the Applicants is, Mohd. Abdul Memon
is claimed to have allotted Otta No.20 in H. Block for carrying out
(rituals) burial of dead members of his family by the Waqf named
Bada Kabrastan, Marine Lines. It is further claimed that the said land
though was allotted by the Trust in favour of his family members, the
Applicant Trustes, thereafter, allotted the same land to other persons
by accepting illegal gratification. As such the offence.
3/7
11 ABA-845-21.doc
3]
Submissions of Counsel for the Applicants are, Applicants are
impleaded in the capacity of office bearers of the Waqf. It is claimed
that Waqf property cannot be allotted to an individual without
following due process of law. In Graveyard/Kabrastan, property
cannot be earmarked for a particular family, as the object with which
the Kabrastan is managed is to provide space for burial of every
Muslim dead person. It is further claimed that allegation of
acceptance of illegal gratification is without any basis and amount, if
any, paid has gone to the Account of the Waqf. As such, it is claimed
that Applicants are entitled for protection from this Court.
4]
Learned APP submits that investigation in the matter depicts that
the Applicants are involved in diverting land earmarked in the
Kabrastan for a particular family after having accepted illegal
gratification. It is further claimed that the amount accepted has not
gone to the Account of the Waqf. As such, it is prayed that Application
be rejected.
5]
Considered rival submissions.
4/7