SHRI. ROHIT @ DADYA SUDAM KADAM – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR – Respondent
12-apeal-160-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 160 OF 2021
Rohit @ Dadya Sudam Kadam
… Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
… Respondents
Mr. Ranjeet Patil, for the Appellant.
Mrs. P.P. Shinde, APP for the Respondent No.1 – State.
Mr. Sariputta Sarnath, for Respondent No.2-Original Complainant.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
V. G. BISHT, JJ.
DATE : 24th JUNE 2022
P. C. :
1
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2
By this Appeal, preferred under Section 14A of the
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)
Act, 1989, the appellant seeks his enlargement on bail in connection
with C.R. No. 225 of 2019 registered with the M.I.D.C. Kupwad
Police Station, District-Sangli for the alleged offences punishable
under Sections 302, 301 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(2)
(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of
Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Rekha Patil 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.