SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SHRI. ROHIT @ DADYA SUDAM KADAM – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR – Respondent


12-apeal-160-2021.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 160 OF 2021

Rohit @ Dadya Sudam Kadam

… Appellant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

… Respondents

Mr. Ranjeet Patil, for the Appellant.

Mrs. P.P. Shinde, APP for the Respondent No.1 – State.

Mr. Sariputta Sarnath, for Respondent No.2-Original Complainant.

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &

V. G. BISHT, JJ.

DATE : 24th JUNE 2022

P. C. :

1

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2

By this Appeal, preferred under Section 14A of the

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)

Act, 1989, the appellant seeks his enlargement on bail in connection

with C.R. No. 225 of 2019 registered with the M.I.D.C. Kupwad

Police Station, District-Sangli for the alleged offences punishable

under Sections 302, 301 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(2)

(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of

Atrocities) Act, 1989.

Rekha Patil 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top