BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
NOORLEN @ NOOR UMAR KHAN – Appellant
Versus
THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AND ANR – Respondent
WP 2283/2021
1 WP 2283-21-Judgment.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2283 OF 2021
Mr. Noorlen @ Noor Umar Khan
]
Age – 25 years, Occ. : Nil
]
Residing at Masjid Chawl, Rajendra Nagar,
]
Borivali (East)
]
… Petitioner
Versus
1. The Divisional Commissioner,
]
Kokan Division, Old Sachivalay, 1st floor,
]
Next to Elphinstone College, Kalaghoda,
]
Fort, Mumbai – 400 032.
]
2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police,
]
Zone-XII, Dahisar (East), Mumbai.
]
3. The State of Maharashtra
]
… Respondents
Mrs. Veena J. Kamble for Petitioner.
Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for State.
CORAM :-
S. S. SHINDE &
N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.
RESERVED ON :- 1 1 AUGUST
, 2021
PRONOUNCED ON :- 07
SEPTEMBER
, 2021
JUDGMENT (PER :
N. J. JAMADAR
, J.)
:-
1.
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of
learned Counsel for the parties, heard finally.
2.
The challenge in this petition is to an order dated
23/03/2021 in Appeal No.16/2021 passed by the Respondent No.1
URS 1 of 9
UMESH
RAMESH
SHINDE
Digitally
signed by
UMESH
RAMESH
SHINDE
Date:
2021.09.07
14:40:49
+0530
2 WP 2283-21-Judgment.odt
whereby the appeal preferred by the Petitioner against the externment
order bearing No. 50$lh$43$ifj-12$21 dated 21/01/2021, passed by the
Respondent No.2, came to be dismissed.
3.
The petition arises in the backdrop of the following facts :
(a)
An externment proceeding was initiated against the Petitioner
at the instance of Kasturba Marg Police Station, Mumbai, on the
premise that the movements and acts of the Petitioner were causing
or calculated to cause alarm, danger or harm to person or property
and that there were reasonable grounds for believing that the
Petitioner was engaged or was about to be engaged in the
commission of offences involving force or violence or offences
punishable under Chapters XVI and XVII of the Indian Penal Code,
1860 (for short, ‘Penal Code’) and the witnesses were not willing to
come forward to give evidence in public against the Petitioner for the
fear of reprisal.
(b)
A show-cause notice was issued to the Petitioner on
01/10/2020. The sponsoring authority alleged therein that two
offences were registered against the Petitioner at Kasturba Marg
Police Station. First, C.R.No.126/2019 for the offences punishable
under Sections 326, 324, 323, 504 and 506 r/w Section 34 of the
URS 2 of 9
3 WP 2283-21-Judgment.odt
Penal Code. Second, C.R.No.780/2020 for the offences punishable
under Sections 326, 324, 323, 504 and 506 r/w Section 34 of the
Penal Code. Preventive action was also initiated under Section 107
of Cr.P.C., 1973. However, the Petitioner continued to indulge in
criminal activities with impunity. It was further alleged that on
account of reign of terror created by the Petitioner, witnesses were
not willing to come forward to give evidence against the Petitioner in
public as they feared for the safety of their life and property. Hence,
in-camera statements of two witnesses were recorded. It transpired
that the Petitioner, alongwith his associates, was committing offences
armed with deadly weapons and extorting money from innocent and
unsuspecting persons within the jurisdiction of Kasturba Marg Police
Station. Hence, it was proposed to extern the Petitioner from the
limits of Mumbai city and suburban and Thane districts for 2 years.
The Petitioner gave reply to the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.