SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
MUSKAN KHATOON W/O. MD. RIZWAN ANSARI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


10.aba.1367-21.doc

Diksha Rane

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1367 OF 2021

MUSKAN KHATOON W/O MD. RIZWAN

ANASARI

..APPLICANT

VS.

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

..RESPONDENT

------------

Mr. S. G. Rajput a/w. Mr. Shubham Kalbere.

Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP for State.

Mr. Palande, PSI, Dr. D. B. Marg Police Station.

------------

CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

DATE : NOVEMBER 25, 2022.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned

APP.

2.

This is an application for pre-arrest bail in connection

with the offence punishable under Sections 419, 420 read

with 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 66C

and 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 registered

vide C.R.No.155 of 2020 with the Dr. D. B. Marg Police

Station.

3.

Learned APP submits that though the Investigating

1

DIKSHA

DINESH

RANE

Digitally

signed by

DIKSHA

DINESH

RANE

Date:

2022.11.25

18:39:33

+0530

10.aba.1367-21.doc

Officer wanted to serve the notice under Section 41A Code

of Criminal Procedure (hereafter ‘the Cr.PC’ for short) on the

applicant, but as the applicant was not available, the notice

could not be served.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top