HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
JAYKUMAR S/O BHAGWAN GORE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR – Respondent
APEAL 506/2022
O-APEAL-506-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 506 OF 2022
Jaykumar s/o. Bhagwan Gore
...Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
...Respondents
……
Mr. Ashok P. Mundargi, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Sanjeev Kadam and
Mr. Vishwajeet Mohite i/b. Mr. Siddharth Karpe for the Appellant.
Mr. S.V. Gavand, APP for the Respondent -State.
Mr. Manoj Mohite, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad for
Respondent No.2.
……
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
V.G.BISHT, JJ.
RESERVED ON : 9TH JUNE, 2022
PRONOUNCED ON : 14TH JUNE, 2022
ORDER: (PER : V.G.BISHT, J.)
1.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2.
Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith with the consent of the
parties and is taken up for final disposal.
3.
This criminal appeal is preferred under Section 14 -A of the
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)
Trupti
1/13
O-APEAL-506-2022.doc
Act, 1989 (for short, “the SC ST Act”) against the order dated 6th
May, 2022 passed below Exhibit 1 in Criminal Bail Application
No. 94 of 2022 by the learned Special Judge and Additional Sessions
Judge, Vaduj, thereby rejecting the application under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, “the Cr.PC”) in
connection with C.R. No. 92 of 2022, registered with the Dahiwadi
Police Station, District – Satara, for the alleged offences punishable
under Sections 193, 199, 200, 419, 420, 423, 205, 209, 467, 426,
465, 468, 471 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, “the
I.P.C.”) and under Sections 3(1) (f) and 3 (1) (g) of the SC ST Act.
4.
The prosecution case in brief is as under :
(a)
First informant Mahadev Piraji Bhise cultivates
agriculture lands bearing Gat Nos. 769, 781 and 782
alongwith his family members. The informant belongs to
“Mang’ caste. His father, namely, Piraji Vishnu Bhise died on
8th October, 2016.
(b)
According to prosecution, adjacent to land bearing
Gat No. 769, the land bearing Gat No. 768 is owned and
Trupti
2/13
O-APEAL-506-2022.doc
cultivated by Jaykumar s/o. Bhagwan Gore i.e. present
appellant, who is the President of the Chhatrapati Shivaji
Education, Mayani. For getting approach road to the
institute from the land owned by informant, the President of
the said institution submitted an application with the
Assistant Director, Town Planning, Satara. In view of the
Rules contemplated under Satara Pradeshik Yojana Vikas
Niyantran, the 15 meter road passing through Gat No. 769
was mandatory. The present appellant had executed an
affidavit bearing No. 4300/2020 dated 11th December, 2020
before the learned Tahsildar/ Executive Magistrate, Man
(Dahiwadi).
(c)
The prosecution alleges that though the father of
informant had expired on 8th October, 2016, the present
appellant alongwith other accused created forged Aadhar
Card and by impersonating the said deceased, prepared
affidavit and the same was submitted with the office of
Assistant Director, Town Planning, Satara and Sub Divisional
Officer, Khatav with an intention to cheat informant and his
Trupti
3/13
O-APEAL-506-2022.doc
family members. Accordingly, an FIR came to be lodged.
5.
Pursuant to the registration of offence and as the investigation
of offence was set in motion, the present appellant approached the
learned Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Vaduj by moving
an application under Section 438 of the Cr.PC and after hearing the
parties, the learned Special Judge was pleased to reject the said
application. Hence, this appeal and prayer for pre-arrest bail.
6.
We have gone through the affidavit-in-reply filed by Sub-
Divisional Police Officer, Dahiwadi Division, Camp Vaduj, Satara in
response to the present appeal.
7.
Mr.Mundargi, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant, submits
that since the alleged offence revolves around the documents and the
fact that purported affidavit dated 11th December, 2020 mentioned in
the FIR is a got up document having do