SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

VIKRAMBHAI PITHUBHAI CHOUDHARI AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


..(1)..

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2235 OF 2008

1.Vikrambhai Pithubhai Choudhari, &

2.Jesinghbhai Keshaval Choudhari. ..Applicants.

Versus

State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent.

....

Mr.Subhash Jha, Sr.Counsel for the applicants.

Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State.

....

CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.

CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.

CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.

DATED : 9th July, 2008.

DATED : 9th July, 2008.

DATED : 9th July, 2008.

P.C.:

1. Heard the learned Advocate for the

Applicants and the learned APP for the State.

2. The applicants came to be granted bail in

the sum of Rs.20,000/- each

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top