SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
S.P. BROTHERS – Appellant
Versus
M/S PRAKASH ENTERPRISES AND ORS – Respondent
APEAL 647/2005



1

1

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5107 OF 2005

IN

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.646 OF 2005

WITH

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.646 OF 2005

S.P.Brothers

through its partner

Mr.Sharad Kakadia .. Appellant.

Vs.

1.M/s.Prakash Enterprises

and Others .. Respondents.

WITH

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5108 OF 2005

IN

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.647 OF 2005

WITH

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.647 OF 2005

S.P.Brothers

through its partner

Mr.Sharad Kakadia .. Appellant.

Vs.

1.M/s.Prakash Enterprises

and Others .. Respondents.

WITH

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5109 OF 2005

IN

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.648 OF 2005

WITH

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.648 OF 2005

S.P.Brothers

through its partner

Mr.Sharad Kakadia .. Appellant.

Vs.

1.M/s.Prakash Enterprises

and Others .. Respondents.

WITH

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5110 OF 2005

IN

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.649 OF 2005

WITH

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.649 OF 2005

2

2

2

S.P.Brothers

through its partner

Mr.Sharad Kakadia .. Appellant.

Vs.

1.M/s.Prakash Enterprises

and Others .. Respondents.

Mr.S.N.Chimade for the appellants.

Mr.P.A.Pol A.P.P. for the State.

CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J.

CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J.

CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J.

DATED : 12TH JULY, 2006

DATED : 12TH JULY, 2006

DATED : 12TH JULY, 2006

P.C.:

. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and

learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Leave to appeal is granted. Appeals admitted.

By consent taken up for final hearing.

3. This group of four aplications under section

378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is filed

seeking leave to appeal against the order of dismissal

dated 6.6.2005 of all the four complaints, and

consequently acquitting all the respondents-accused of

the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable

Instruments Act. The parties in all the four

applications are same. On 14th June, 2006 when all

the leave applications with memo of appeal were plac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top