SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
M/S A.B.I. EXPRESS PVT.LTD – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1631 OF 2004

M/s.A.B.I. Express Pvt. Ltd. .. Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents

Mr.A.J.Panicker for petitioner

Mr.K.K.Jadhav for respondent No.2

Mr.S.S.Tatkare, A.P.P. for State.

CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.

DATE : 1st December 2005.

P.C.

. Rule. Respondents waive service. Heard

learned Counsel appearing for parties.

. At the request of Mr.Panicker, appearing

for petitioner, name of respondent No.3 is

2

deleted.

2. Rule. Mr.Jadhav appearing for respondent

No.2 waives service. A.P.P. appears for State.

By consent heard forthwith.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top