1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2748 OF 2006

Shankar Bajirao Kudale

.. Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra

.. Respondent

Mr.S.S.Kulkarni

for

applicant

Mr.S.Hingorani, A.P.P. for State.

CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.

DATE : 16th August 2006

P.C.

.

Heard Mr.Kulkarni for applicant and

learned A.P.P. for prosecution. Perused

annexures to the application as also copy of

Chemical Analysis report which was sought for by

the learned A.P.P. on the last occasion.

2.

It is not disputed before me that the

other accused are on regular bail and enlarged so

2

by the learned Magistrate.

3.

The offences alleged in this case are

punishable under section 328 of I.P.C. and 65(f)

of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. It appears from

the record that other persons arrested including

the truck driver have been enlarged on bail.

Since the allegation is that the consignment was

delivered at the instance of the present

applicant, learned A.P.P. sought time to produce

C.A. report. Copy of report discloses that no