JUDGMENT:-

1). This application filed by a practising Advocate seeks expunging of remarks by the Sessions Court against him in its order dated 15th June, 2004 passed on Criminal Revision Application (St) No. 1992 of 2004 arising out of C.B.I. Criminal Case No. 375/CP/2002 (“the C.B.I. Case” for short), quashing of the suo-moto enquiry directed against him by the Court and for quashing of notice under Section 35 of the Advocate Act, 1961 issued by the Disciplinary Committee No.2 in Disciplinary Case No. 265 of 2004.

2). Respondent no.1 is accused no.1 in the CBI Case. Respondent no.2 is the CBI, respondent no.3 is the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa and respondent no.4 is the State of Maharashtra. Respondent no.1 had filed the Revision Application to challenge the order of the trial Court rejecting his application for bail, forfeiting the cash bail granted to him and issuing a non-bailable warrant against him. The application for bail had been made after respondent no.2 had surrendered before the trial Court. The R