SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
S. S. Shinde, N.J. Jamadar, JJ
Kamlesh Talekar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Rajiv Patil, Mr.Prashant M. Patil
For the Respondents: Mr.V.B. Konde-Deshmukh

ORDER :

1. This is an application for suspension of sentence under section 389 of the Criminal Procedure Code , 1973 (‘the Code’), during the pendency of the appeal.

2.

3. The applicant-original accused No.8 came to be convicted alongwith eight other accused, for the offence punishable under section 302 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (‘the Penal Code’) and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and pay fne of Rs.5,000/- with default stipulation, for having committed murder of Eknath Baban Kudale (‘the deceased’) in furtherance of his common intention with the convicted co- accused, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, by judgment and order dated 30th January 2021 in Sessions Case No.460 of 2015.

4. Being aggrieved thereby and dissatisfed therewith, the appellant has preferred this appeal assailing the legality, propriety and correctness of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence.

5. The applicant has preferred the instant application with the assertion that the learned Additional Sessions Judge committed a manifest error in returning the fnding of guilt qua the applicant sans legal evidence. The fact that the testimony of Kashinath Baban Ku

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top