SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIRENDRASINGH GYANSINGH BISHT
MUAZZAM MAQSOOD BHAIJI AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


ABA-1742-2021.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1742 OF 2021

Muazzam Maqsood Bhaiji and Anr.

Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Respondents

Mr. Rizwan Merchant a/w Faisal F. Shaikh i/b Ms. Sanjana

Pardeshi, for the Applicants.

Smt. Anamika Malhotra, APP, for the State-Respondent No.1

Mr. Sandeep R. Karnik, for Respondent No.2.

CORAM : V. G. BISHT, J.

RESERVED ON : 10th December, 2021.

PRONOUNCED ON : 20th January, 2022.

PC:

The applicants are seeking Anticipatory Bail in connection

with C.R. No. 60 of 2021 registered with Kharghar Police Station,

Navi Mumbai, for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420,

465, 467, 468, 471, 474, 120B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2

The prosecution case in short is that, informant purchased

48.9 gunthas land in the name of Chinmay Associates from Survey

Rekha Patil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top