HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
PRANAV BALWANT MARATHE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
ABA 1672/2021
1/13 ABA 1505-21.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1505 OF 2021
Manjiri Kaustubh Marathe
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
WITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1672 OF 2021
Pranav Balwant Marathe
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
WITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1673 OF 2021
Neena Balwant Marathe
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
…
Mr. Manoj Mohite, Sr. Advocate with Chaitanya Pendse for the
applicant in ABA 1505/21.
Mr.A.H.H. Ponda, Sr. Advocate with Reshma Mutha, Meherpuja
Mathur and Nikhil Kulkarni for applicant in ABA 1672/21 and
1673/21.
Mr.A.R. Kapadnis, APP for the State.
Mr.Kuldip T. Pawar for intervenor in both matters.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J.
DATED : 6th AUGUST, 2021
Tilak
2/13 ABA 1505-21.doc
P.C:-
1
‘All that Glitters is not Gold’ is what the investors
who invested amount over Five crores with a prominent Jeweller
in the City of Pune, on an assurance of high returns, have
perceived.
By the three Applications, the applicants are seeking
protection from arrest in connection with C.R.No. 0064/21
registered on 11th March 2021 with Kothrud police station,
thereby invoking Section 406, 420 read with Section 34 of the
IPC and Section of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of
Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 [for short ‘the
MPID Act’]
ABA No. 1505/21 is filed by Manjiri Marathe
(Accused no.3) whereas ABA 1673/21 is filed on behalf of Neena
Marathe (Accused no.4) and in ABA 1672/21 – Pranav Marathe
(Accused no.5) is the applicant.
2
Heard learned Senior counsel Mr.Manoj Mohite for
the applicant in first application whereas the other applicants are
represented by learned senior counsel Mr.A.H.H.Ponda. Learned
APP Mr.A.R.Kapadnis is representing the State and learned
Advocate Kuldeep Pawar has filed the application for
intervention and appeared for the complainant.
Tilak
3/13 ABA 1505-21.doc
3
The subject C.R came to be registered on a complaint
filed by a house wife who was lured in investing money in a
scheme of Fixed Deposit propagated by Pranav Marathe Jewellers
of which Milind Marathe, Pranav Marathe, Kaustubh Marathe
and Neena Marathe are the Directors on being assured of 15%
interest on the deposit. She invested an amount of Rs.29 lakhs
for a period of one year and in the year 2016, re-invested the said
amount on its maturity. Apart from this, she also invested an
amount of Rs.8 lakhs in the scheme totalling to Rs.37 lakhs and
in the year 2017, an amount of Rs.37,80,000/- which was due,
which was again re-invested in the scheme run by Pranav Marathe
Jewellers for a period of one year with an assurance of 15%
returns. Though the date of maturity of the Fixed Deposit
expired, there was no return on repeated request. No explanation
was afforded by those who accepted the amount as to why the
amount was not coming back. Apart from the complainant,
names of several other investors are also mentioned in the FIR
who had invested their amount in the scheme floated by Pranav
Marathe Jewellers and the total amount which was invested by
various investors, which remain unpaid is Rs.5,07,02,970/-.
4
The complaint set the investigation machinery rolling
and it has surfaced that Pravin Marathe Jewellers, a Private
Tilak
4/13 ABA 1505-21.doc
Limited Company, Laxmi Road is registered and incorporated
under the provisions of the Companies Act in the year 2011-12.
The Directors of the said Company are one Milind Marath
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.