SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
PRAKASH D. NAIK, J
Prakash Chimanlal Sheth – Appellant
Versus
T. Ramalingam Nadar @ Ramalingam Thirivium Nadar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Rahul S. Kadam
For the Respondents: A.R. Patil

ORDER :

1. The applicant has invoked the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code , challenging Order dated 13th February, 2020 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate 14th Court, Girgaon Mumbai in C.C. No.5658/SS/2015 rejecting application Exh.36.

2. The applicant is the complainant in C.C. No.5658/SS/2015 pending before Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 14th Court, Girgaon Mumbai. The Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are accused in the said proceedings. The complainant has alleged that in discharge of liability the accused issued Cheque Bearing No. 519681 in favour of complainant for Rs.3,00,000/-. The cheque was deposited by Digitally signed SUNNY by SUNNY ANKUSHRAO ANKUSHRAO THOTE THOTE Date: 2023.02.22 complainant for clearing on 31st August, 2015. It was dishonoured 14:52:26 +0530 vide return memo dated 3rd November, 2015 for want of sufficient funds in the account. The Accused was called upon to make payment. Payment was not made. Complaint was filed for an offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act (for short ‘N.I. Act).

3. Verification statement of the complainant was recorded. Process was issued against the Accused for an of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top