SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
SALIM BAIG UMAR BAIG – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


1

913. WP 2263.21.doc

JPP

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2263 OF 2021

Salim Baig Umar Baig

… Petitioner

V/s.

The State of Maharashtra

... Respondent

Ms. Gauri Velankar, Advocate appointed through Legal Aid for the

Petitioner

Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for the Respondent - State

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR &

SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : 18 NOVEMBER 2021

P.C. :-

By this Petition the Petitioner has sought Emergency

(Covid-19) Parole which has been rejected by the impugned order.

2.

The impugned order states that the Petitioner when

released on 6 June 2011, overstayed for 783 days and had to be

arrested. The learned APP has placed on record subsequent order

rejecting the prayer for emergency parole dated 2 June 2021. The

learned APP has also placed the chart before us that the Petitioner

when was released three times earlier, habitually overstayed for 14

August 2007 parole returned after 533 days, on 22 August 2010,

2

913. WP 2263.21.doc

592 days and on 26 August 2013, 783 days. The learned APP

submits that the emergency parole is under Maharashtra Priso

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top