HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
RIPU SUDAN BALKRISHAN KUNDRA ALIAS RAJ KUNDRA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
WP 2612/2021
ssm 1 cri.wp-2611.21.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2611 OF 2021
Ryan John Michael Thorpe,
Age 43 years, Occu. : Service,
Residing at A 901, Meridian CHS Ltd.,
Sector No.-6, Plot No-25 & 26,
Nerul West, Navi Mumbai – 400706.
…Petitioner.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra,
Crime Branch, CID, Property Cell,
Byculla, Through the Public
Prosecutor, High Court,
Mumbai.
…Respondent
WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2612 OF 2021
Ripu Sudan Balkishan Kundra
Alias Raj Kundra,
Age 45 years, Occ.: Business,
Residing at of 1st Floor, Kinara Building,
Dr. R.S. Jain Marg, Juhu,
Mumbai-400049.
…Petitioner.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra,
Crime Branch, CID, Property Cell,
Byculla, Through the Public
Prosecutor, High Court,
Mumbai.
…Respondent
Mr. Abhinav Chandrachud a/w. Mr. Hitesh Jain, Mr. Subhash Jadhav, Mr.
Chandansingh Shekhawat, Mr. Yashovardhan Deshmukh and Ms. Farishta
Menon i/b. Parinam Law Associates for the Petitioner in Writ Petition
No.2611 of 2021.
1/21
ssm 2 cri.wp-2611.21.doc
Mr. Aabad Ponda, Senior Counsel a/w. Mr. Hitesh Jain, Mr. Subhash Jadhav,
Mr. Chandansingh Shekhawat, Mr. Yashovardhan Deshmukh and Ms.
Farishta Menon i/b. Parinam Law Associates for the Petitioner in Writ
Petition No.2612 of 2021.
Mrs. Aruna Pai, Public Prosecutor for the Respondent-State in both
Petitions.
Mr. Kiran Bidve, Investigating Officer present.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J.
RESERVED ON : 2nd AUGUST, 2021
PRONOUNCED ON : 7th AUGUST, 2021.
P.C.:-
By the present Petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India and under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for
short, “Cr.P.C.”), the Petitioners Accused No.11 and 10 respectively, have
impugned the common Order dated 20th July, 2021 passed by the learned
Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 37th Court, Esplanade, Mumbai in
R.A. No.640 of 2021 in C.R. No.26/2021 of DCB, CID (Property Cell),
Mumbai thereby, remanding the Petitioners to police custody and all Orders
of subsequent remands by the Trial Court, which extend the custody of the
Petitioners and for their release from custody.
2
Heard Mr. Ponda, learned senior counsel appearing for the
Petitioner in Writ Petition No.2612 of 2021, Mr. Abhinav Chandrachud,
learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner in Writ Petition No.2611 of
2021 and Mrs. Pai, learned Public Prosecutor for the Respondent-State in
both the Petitions. Perused record.
2/21
ssm 3 cri.wp-2611.21.doc
3
The record reveals that, a crime bearing No.103 of 2021 dated
5th February, 2021 was originally registered with Malvani Police Station,
Mumbai. The said crime was transferred to Detection of Crime Branch, CID
(Property Cell), Byculla, Mumbai on the same day which was renumbered
as CR No.26 of 2021 under Sections 354(c), 292, 293, 420 read with
Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 66(E), 67, 67(A) of the
Information Technology Act, 2000 and Sections 3,4,6 and 7 of the Indecent
Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986. During the course of
investigation, initially complicity of 9 accused persons was disclosed and
after completion of investigation against them, a charge sheet has been filed
on 3rd April, 2021 in the Court of the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate, 37th Court, Esplanade, Mumbai. The said charge sheet is
numbered as CC No.251/PW/2021. During the course of investigation
Umesh Ganpat Kamat (Accused No.7) revealed participation of Petitioners
in the present crime. Apart from it, from the statement of other witnesses,
the role of Petitioners and their complicity in the crime was also revealed.
The investigating agency, thereafter obtained permission from the Trial
Court for further investigation as contemplated under Sectio