SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Appellant
Versus
SHRI GJUSTIN J.SOZ and ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER', 'R NO', '', '', 'SERVED', '', 'SHRI A S KHANDEPARKAR']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

FIRST APPEAL NO. 309 OF 1997

The State of Maharashtra ........Appellant

versus

Ghustin J. Soz & ors ........Respondents.

Ms. V.S. Mhaispurkar APP for the Appellant.

Mr. Amogh Karandikar adv. for the Respondent.

CORAM: B. R. GAVAI,J.

DATED : 30th August, 2010.

P.C.:

1.

By consent the appeal is taken up for final hearing.

Heard Mr. Karandikar the learned counsel for the respondent and

Ms. Mhaispurkar the learned APP for State.

2.

The present appeal challenges the judgment and award

passed by the learned Jt. Civil Judge S.D. Ratnagiri dated

14-9-1996 in Land Acquisition Reference No. 18/93. The Land

admeasuring 1H. 90.2R. belonging to the appellant has been

acquired. The notification under sec. 4 was issued on 1-9-1989.

The collector had determined the compensation at Rs. 37803/-.

Being aggreived thereby a reference has been preferred by the

present appellant. The reference has been allowed and the

compensation has been granted at the rate of Rs. 1000/- per R.

3.

A Division Bench of this court in F.A. No. 150/96 in case

2

of s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top