HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
MAHAMMAD ISRAIL MAHAMMAD AAYUB ANSARI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
APEAL 741/2005
['SMT ROHINI DANDEKAR', 'APPPOINTED ADV', '', 'THROUGH JAIL', 'P P']
4. apeal 741-05.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 741 OF 2005
Mahammad Israil Mahammad Aayub
]
Ansari,
]
Convict Prisoner No. C/5254,
]
Nashik Road Central Prison, Nashik.
] Appellant
(Org. Accused)
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
] Respondent
Ms. Rohini Dandekar, Advocate appointed for the Appellant
Mr. D.P. Adsule, APP for the State
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
A.R. JOSHI, JJ
DATE : NOVEMBER 30, 2012.
ORAL JUDGMENT [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] :-
1
This Appeal is directed by the Appellant-original accused
against the judgment and order dated 13.01.2005 passed by the
learned Additional Sessions Judge, Niphad in Sessions Case No. 3
of 2004. By the said judgment and order, the learned Sessions
Judge convicted the Appellant under Section 302 of IPC and
sentenced him to life imprisonment. The Appellant was also
convicted under Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act and
sentenced to imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay
Pg 1 of 8
4. apeal 741-05.doc
fine of Rs. 100/- in default imprisonment for one week. The
Appellant was further convicted under Section 25 of the Arms Act
and sentenced to imprisonment for a period of three years and
fine of Rs. 1000/- in default imprisonment for one month. The
learned Sessions Judge directed substantive sentences of
imprisonment to run concurrently.
2
The prosecution case briefly stated, is as under:
(i)
PW 2 Mohammad Altak was residing with his wife and
three children at Madaninagar, Yeola, Dist. Nasik. He has four
brothers including deceased Ashpak. Ashpak was staying on the
same plot as PW 1 Mohammad Altak but just behind the house of
Mohammad Altak. PW 2 Mohammad Altak also had a sister by
name Sadika Banu Sadika Banu was married to the Appellant
about 10 years prior to the incident. They had a son and a
daughter. As the appellant was constantly in jail for some crime
or the other, Sadika Banu and her children used to stay with her
father i.e also the father of PW 2 Mohammad Altak as well as
father of deceased Ashpak. On two occasions, brothers of Sadika
Banu got the Appellant released on bail. The Appellant is a
habitual offender. There were a number of cases against him.
After the Appellant was released on bail on two occasions earlier,
thereafter when the appellant went to jail, the brothers of Sadika
Banu did not make any efforts to release the appellant from jail.
Due to this, the appellant was very much annoyed. In May 2003,
Pg 2 of 8
4. apeal 741-05.doc
the Appellant was released from jail, thereafter, he started saying
that as the brothers of Sadika Banu did not make any efforts to
release him from jail and now that he is released from jail, he will
kill all her brothers one by one. On account of this, Sadika Banu
had also made a complaint to Yeola City Police Station. That NC is
on record at Exhibit 61.
(ii)
On 03.11.2003, PW 1 Mohammad Altak returned home
at about 09.00 to 09.15 p.m. At that time, Parvin Banu, sister-in-
law of Altak came to his house which is situated behind the house
of Altak, crying and shouting that the Appellant is abusing Ashpak.
Therefore, PW 2 immediately rushed to the house of Ashpak. He
saw the appellant taking out a sword from his waist and giving a
blow on the right side of the head behind the right ear of Ashpak
and another blow on the right shoulder. He saw PW 8 Hasina -
Ashpak's wife was also present at the spot. Ashpak fell on the
ground. Thereafter, the appellant ran away form the spot. Ashpak
was taken to hospital but the Doctor, on examining him, declared
him to be dead. Thereafter, PW 2 Mohammad Altak went to the
Police Station and lodged his FIR (Exhibit 19). Thereafter,
investigation commenced. The dead body of Ashpak was sent for
postmortem. PW 7 Dr. Laturkar performed the postmortem o