SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
HANUMANT PANDURANG INDALKAR – Appellant
Versus
TATA ENGINEERING and LOCOMOTIVE CO.LTD – Respondent


Advocates:
['SHRI S A SAWANT', 'M/S MULLA', 'MULLA C B C', '', 'FOR R NO', 'R NO IS FORMAL PARTY']

: 1 :

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO.873 OF 2001

WRIT PETITION NO.873 OF 2001

WRIT PETITION NO.873 OF 2001

Hanumant Pandurang Indalkar )

Walhekarwadi, Near Datta Mandir )

Chinchwadgaon, Pune 411 033. ).. Petitioner

Versus

1) Tata Engineering and Locomotive )

Co. Ltd. )

Pimpri, Pune 411 018. )

2) Presiding Officer )

Second Labour Court )

Pune. ).. Respondents

Mr.Arshad Shaikh for the Petitioner.

Mr.C.U.Singh with Mr.K.S.Bapat,

Mr.H.Vakil and Mr.Mehta i/b.Mulla & Mulla & Craigie

Blunt and Caroe for Respondent No.1.

Respondent No.2 formal party.

CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.

CORAM: SMT.NISHITA M

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top