SWAMINATHAN VENKATRAMAN THROUGH ITS C.A. VAIDYANATHAN BALKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
RAMESH ANANT PRASAD BAKSHI AND ORS – Respondent
1 of 2 8.WP.2502.2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2502 OF 2022
Swaminathan Venkatraman through its C.A.
Vaidyanathan Balkrishnan
Petitioner
versus
Ramesh Anant Prasad Bakshi and others
Respondents
Mr.Siddhesh Bhole with Ahmed Padela i/by SSB Legal & Advisory,
Advocates for petitioner.
Ms.Mallika Ingle, Advocate for respondent nos.1,2,3 and 6.
Mr.A.D.Kamkhedkar, APP, for State.
Mr.Anand Vaidyanathan, original complainant/petitioner, present.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE : 25th July 2022
PC :
1.
The petitioner is the original complainant in C.C.No.505/SW/
2014. Learned Magistrate vide order dated 10th May 2022 allowed
withdrawal of the complaint unconditionally at the request of
complainant. However, subsequently vide order dated 11th May
2022, the order was recalled and application for withdrawal was
rejected. Perhaps the withdrawal order was recalled because the
case was warrant triable.
2.
The power of attorney holder of original complainant through
whom present petition is filed, is present in Court. On
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.