SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SWAMINATHAN VENKATRAMAN THROUGH ITS C.A. VAIDYANATHAN BALKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
RAMESH ANANT PRASAD BAKSHI AND ORS – Respondent


1 of 2 8.WP.2502.2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2502 OF 2022

Swaminathan Venkatraman through its C.A.

Vaidyanathan Balkrishnan

Petitioner

versus

Ramesh Anant Prasad Bakshi and others

Respondents

Mr.Siddhesh Bhole with Ahmed Padela i/by SSB Legal & Advisory,

Advocates for petitioner.

Ms.Mallika Ingle, Advocate for respondent nos.1,2,3 and 6.

Mr.A.D.Kamkhedkar, APP, for State.

Mr.Anand Vaidyanathan, original complainant/petitioner, present.

CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

DATE : 25th July 2022

PC :

1.

The petitioner is the original complainant in C.C.No.505/SW/

2014. Learned Magistrate vide order dated 10th May 2022 allowed

withdrawal of the complaint unconditionally at the request of

complainant. However, subsequently vide order dated 11th May

2022, the order was recalled and application for withdrawal was

rejected. Perhaps the withdrawal order was recalled because the

case was warrant triable.

2.

The power of attorney holder of original complainant through

whom present petition is filed, is present in Court. On

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top