SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SHAKUNTALA SHANKARAO SALGAR AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH MINISTER, REVENUE DEPT. AND ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['PAWAR NIKHIL NARENDRA', 'GOVERNMENT PLEADER WRIT CELL', '', 'R NO TO', 'R NO', 'PRADEEP J THORAT']

1/4

20-wp.12811.2016.doc

nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.12811 OF 2016

Shakuntala Shankarao Salgar and Anr.

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

Mr.N.N.Pawar, for the Petitioners.

Mr.Y.D.Patil, A.G.P for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5.

Mr.P.J.Thorat, for the Respondent Nos.6 to 9.

Mr.Vinod Wase, Desk Officer, Revenue Department is present.

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE : 4th OCTOBER, 2018

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

By this petition, the Petitioners have impugned the order dated

26th August, 2014, passed by the Hon’ble Minister, Revenue Department,

in Revision Application No.RTS -3613/5066/P.K.71/J-5A.

3.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submitted that the

2/4

20-wp.12811.2016.doc

impugned order was passed by the Hon’ble Minister without hearing the

Petitioners. He submitted that neither the Petitioners nor their Advocate

was heard by the Hon’ble Minister before passing the impugned order 26th

August, 2014. Learned Counsel submits that having regard to the same, the

impugned order be quashed and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top