ABHIJEET PRAKASH KHOT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETRAY HIGHER EDUCATION AND ANR – Respondent
WP 8169/2022
16-wp-8169-2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8169 OF 2022
Abhijeet Prakash Khot
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
Thr. Secretary, Higher Education & Anr.
...Respondents
----
Mr.A.S. Khadeparkar a/w Mr.Rushikesh G. Bhagat i/b
Khadeparkar & Associate for the Petitioner.
Mr.Y.D. Patil, AGP for the Respondent-State.
Mr.Yuvraj Narvankar for the Respondent-University.
----
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA &
S.M. MODAK, JJ.
DATE : 13 JULY 2022
P.C:-
.
We have heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner.
2.
The learned counsel submits that the date for
examination is not yet provided. The Respondent is supposed to
conduct the examination in MCQ pattern as directed by the
Hon’ble Minster Higher and Technical Education in its meeting
dated 25-4-2022. The Respondent is further required to give 15
minutes extra time for each one hour. If the paper is of three
hours then 45 minutes extra time has to be provided.
N.S. Kamble page 1 of 3
NILAM
SANTOSH
KAMBLE
Digitally signed
by NILAM
SANTOSH
KAMBLE
Date:
2022.07.21
13:38:34 +0530
16-wp-8169-2022
3.
The Respondents are not adhering to the decision
taken in the meeting dated 25-4-2022 in presence of the Hon’ble
Minster. The University cannot over ride the decision taken in
the meeting by the State Government.
4.
The learned counsel for the University submits that
the exams would commence on 25 July 2022, the examinations
would be conducted following MCQ pattern. If the exam is
conducted on the basis of the MCQ pattern then no question
arises of giving a question bank or extra time.
5.
Sofar as the grievance of the Petitioner qua holding
the examination as per MCQ pattern and the date of
examination is concerned the same stand redressed.
6.
The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that
the direction given in the meeting dated 25-4-2022 does not
make a distinction between holding the examination on the basis
of the MCQ pattern or a descriptive answer. In examination 15
minutes are to be given extra for every one hour. In MCQ
pattern the questions are mainly objective. In view of that, 15
minutes extra time may not be necessary. It is also submitted that
the question bank has to be given, if the questions are in
descriptive mode.
N.S. Kamble page 2 of 3
16-wp-8169-2022
7.
In light of the above, no further orders would be
necessary.
8.
Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
(S.M. MODAK, J.)
(S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
N.S. Kamble page 3 of 3
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.