SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MAH'TRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
SHRI KISHORE KONDIRAM JAGADE and ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['SHRI G S HEGDE', 'SHRI G S GODBOLE', '', 'FOR R NOS TO', 'RESP NO IS FORMAL', 'PARTY', 'SHRI S M DHARAP']

:1:

:1:

:1:

HIGH

HIGH

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL

CIVIL

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

LETTERS

LETTERS

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 203 OF 2001.

PATENT APPEAL NO. 203 OF 2001.

PATENT APPEAL NO. 203 OF 2001.

Maharashtra State Road Transport

Corporation Through: Divisional

Traffic Officer, Maharashtra,

Thane, Head Office At Bombay.

..Appellants.

VERSUS.

1. Kishore Kondiram Jagade,

2. Rajendra Tukaram Salunkhe,

3. Uday Shivram Mahadik,

4. Ravindra Shankar Padwal,

5. Shrikant Harichand Shinde,

6. Naresh Laxman Zaware,

7. Santosh Laxman Mali,

8. Naresh Pundlik Thale,

9. Ramesh Nathuram Naik,

10.Santosh Gangaram Patil,

11.Dipak Ganpat Vartak,

12.Vithal Hasha Gaikwad,

13.Ashok Babanrao Dudhsagar,

14.Sandip Gopinath Kadam,

15.Mohan Ganpat Kadam,

16.Mohan Rama Patil,

17.Sanjay Tukaram Shedge,

18.Sambhaji Savalaram Gharat,

19.Ramdas Jagganath Mhatre,

All: Raigad.

20.Presiding Officer,

Industrial Court, Thane.

..RESPONDENTS.

----

Mr. G.S.Hegde for appellant.

Mr. S.M.Dharap with Mr. G.S.Godbole for respo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top