SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SANATKUMAR K JAIN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


22-APL-611-21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.611 OF 2021

Sanatkumar K. Jain

… Applicant

Vs

The State of Maharashtra

... Respondents

Mr. K.H.Parekh i/by Mhatre & Associates for the

Applicant.

Mr. S.S.Hulke, APP for the Respondent-State.

CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.

DATE : 16

th SEPTEMBER, 2021.

(Through Video Conferencing)

ORAL JUDGMENT:

Heard.

2

Rule.

3

With consent of the learned counsel for the

parties, matter is taken up for fnal hearing forthwith.

Shivgan 1/8

SHAMBHAVI

NILESH

SHIVGAN

Digitally signed by

SHAMBHAVI

NILESH SHIVGAN

Date: 2021.09.18

15:49:04 +0530

22-APL-611-21.odt

4

Food Safety Ofcer, Raigad Food and Drug

Administration, Raigad, prosecuted applicant, Deputy

General Manager of M/s. Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd.

(Accused No.3-Company) for alleged violation of the

provisions of Section 26(2)(i) and Section 20 read with 3(1)

(zz)(xii) punishable under Sections 59 and 66 of the Food

Safety an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top