Gehana Vasisht Alias Vandana Ravindra Tiwari vs The State of Maharashtra

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J
Gehana Vasisht Alias Vandana Ravindra Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Abhishek Yende a/w Pravada Raut
For the Respondents: Ms. P.P. Shinde

Table of Content
1. allegations of coercion and exploitation for filming obscene content. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. previous crimes and evidence against applicant are established. (Para 3)
3. court emphasizes the severity of charges leading to denial of bail. (Para 5)
4. applicant seeks anticipatory bail for allegations of coercion and exploitation. (Para 6)
5. arguments highlighting the seriousness of allegations and the concept of trafficking. (Para 7)
6. arguments opposing bail due to serious allegations sufficient for custodial interrogation. (Para 8 , 9)
7. legal interpretations indicating consent is immaterial in trafficking allegations. (Para 10 , 11)
8. court's conclusion on the necessity of custodial interrogation reflecting the seriousness of charges. (Para 12)

O R D E R : -

1. Applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in connection w ith the C rim e No. 1097/2021 dated 30th July, 2021 registered w ith M alw ani Police Station, M alad at the instance, of adult-victim , under Sections 3 54-C , 292, 293, 420 and 34 of Indian Penal C ode, 1860; Section 6 6-E , 67, 67- A, of Inform ation Technology Act and Sections 2 , 3, 4, 6 and 7 of Indecent Representation of W om en’s Act. Later, crim e w as trans

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

BOMBAY HIGH COURTSANDEEP K. SHINDE, JGehana Vasisht Alias Vandana Ravindra Tiwari – AppellantVersusThe State of Maharashtra – Respondent

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J
Gehana Vasisht Alias Vandana Ravindra Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent