SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
DANISH NASEEM QURESHI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR – Respondent


3. APL 13-2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 13 OF 2021

Danish Naseem Qureshi

...Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

Mr. M.A. Adenwala for the Applicant.

Ms. S.V.Sonawane, A.P.P for the Respondent No.1-State.

Mr. Satish Muley a/w Mr. Sajid Qureshi for the Respondent No.2.

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE : 17

th MARCH, 2021

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

By this application, the applicant has impugned the order dated

23/10/2020 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 14th Court,

Girgaon, Mumbai below Exh.19 in C.C.No.1408/SS/2019, by which the

applicant was directed to pay 20% of the amount of subject cheque as

interim compensation to the respondent No.2 (original complainant), within

60 days from the date of order.

Wakodikar

1/4

3. APL 13-2021.doc

3.

Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that there was no

justification for the learned Judge to direct the applicant to deposit the said

interim compensation, inasmuch as, the transaction was not a commercial

transaction. He submitted that the responden

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top